guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#spencerpootis15-v-ridgevilleborn
This is the start of #spencerpootis15-v-ridgevilleborn channel.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-19 03:13 p.m.
# CV-0077-24 [spencerpootis15 v. RidgevilleBorn](https://trello.com/c/4gTZVup8/351-spencerpootis15-v-ridgevilleborn)
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CV-0077-24 spencerpootis15 v. RidgevilleBorn

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned:

Complaint Attached: Yes

---

UPCOMING COURT DATES



PAST COURT EVENTS



PARTIES**

```
Complaint -- spencerpootis15
Defendant -- Ridgev...
Labels
Civil
krabz pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:08 p.m.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-19 03:13 p.m.
@nauvelty has been added as the counsel of record for Plaintiff
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-19 03:14 p.m.
your client seems to not be in this server
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-19 03:14 p.m.
will tell him to join @krabz
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-19 04:33 p.m.
but in advance for his honour @Richo , i'll have reduced activity for the next two weeks since ill be in canada with my family: simultaneously ill have to study for my gcse mocks
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-19 04:34 p.m.
i will attempt to respond to the court promptly but as a forewarning expect a delay in filing
Richo
Richo 2024-12-19 05:02 p.m.
Yes no worries
krabzatonin ᴏᴍkrabzatonin ᴏᴍ
your client seems to not be in this server
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 08:43 a.m.
client is now in the server btw @goodness gracious
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 08:43 a.m.
forgot to mention yesterday
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-21 10:05 a.m.
Ok added
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-21 10:57 a.m.
Hello.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-21 10:58 a.m.
@nauvelty Will you be asking for a summons?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:46 a.m.
yes drafting it up as we speak
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:52 a.m.
filed, sending it as a google drive rn:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:55 a.m.
cc: @Richo @krabz
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-21 11:57 a.m.
Will wait for richo’s approval before sending
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:58 a.m.
:👍:
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-21 11:58 a.m.
@Solicitor General's Office this seems to mention official capacity
krabzatonin ᴏᴍkrabzatonin ᴏᴍ
@Solicitor General's Office this seems to mention official capacity
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:59 a.m.
mb: i discussed it with the doj in arbitration & i told them it was not official because it was unconstitutional
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-21 11:59 a.m.
i forgot to change it in the complaint tho
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-21 11:59 a.m.
Oh ok
Richo
Richo 2024-12-22 11:50 a.m.
Yes send
Richo
Richo 2024-12-22 11:51 a.m.
@krabz @nauvelty
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 01:59 p.m.
OKAY
RichoRicho
Yes send
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:03 p.m.
https://imgur.com/a/8bxPKke It has been served
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:58 p.m.
@Born has been added to the channel and may indicate their presence by responding to this message.
CC: @nauvelty @Richo
Born
Born 2024-12-22 02:58 p.m.
Present
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:58 p.m.
actually
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:58 p.m.
@nauvelty can you re-do the numbering on your CC
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:59 p.m.
krabzatonin ᴏᴍkrabzatonin ᴏᴍ
@nauvelty can you re-do the numbering on your CC
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-22 02:59 p.m.
ye ws gonna do that today
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 02:59 p.m.
okay thanks
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 03:00 p.m.
ping here when submitted
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-22 03:24 p.m.
@krabz amended complaint filed & will submit google drive form for convenience here
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-22 03:25 p.m.
cc: @Richo
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-22 10:29 p.m.
@ryan has been added
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-22 10:38 p.m.
hi
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-22 10:39 p.m.
@Richo we're going to file an mtd and we'd like to toll the response timer until that is decided
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-22 10:39 p.m.
if I am lucky it will be filed tonight, if not today by EOD tomorrow
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-22 10:39 p.m.
cc: @nauvelty
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-23 02:01 p.m.
@krabz @Born
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-23 06:02 p.m.
Pinged the two wrong person
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@krabz @Born
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-23 06:02 p.m.
@nauvelty @Richo apologies i am stupid
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@nauvelty @Richo apologies i am stupid
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-23 06:03 p.m.
no worries LOL: will be filing a response tomorrow
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-23 06:03 p.m.
Perf just wanted to make sure u saw it
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-23 06:04 p.m.
:👍:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-25 09:54 a.m.
filed, google drive form for convenience is linked: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b_Y45KOmnk7hqSLNHC6yV3nGfclKEQXk/view?usp=sharing
cc: @ryan @Richo
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-25 09:55 a.m.
also merry christmas
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 07:14 p.m.
@Richo hi this exists
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@Richo hi this exists
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 07:16 p.m.
Hi do not contact me regarding my cases outside of this court chat
RichoRicho
Hi do not contact me regarding my cases outside of this court chat
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 07:18 p.m.
Hi please try to expediently respond to the case channel so we aren't left wondering if the judge is going to actually dispose of this case
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@Richo we're going to file an mtd and we'd like to toll the response timer until that is decided
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 07:19 p.m.
You've yet to respond to this or acknowledge our motion at all.
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Hi please try to expediently respond to the case channel so we aren't left wondering if the judge is going to actually dispose of this case
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 07:34 p.m.
No
RichoRicho
No
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 08:11 p.m.
Then the contact will be continuing until your honor can decide he wants to utilize the full capacity of his brain
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Then the contact will be continuing until your honor can decide he wants to utilize the full capacity of his brain
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 08:14 p.m.
You have until midnight EST to retracting this statement
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 08:14 p.m.
Are you going to respond to any of the prior-to Christmas statements?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 08:15 p.m.
3 hours and 45 mins
RichoRicho
You have until midnight EST to retracting this statement
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 09:03 p.m.
I apologize and retract the statement. I was out of line and I promised to be more respectful to the Court in the future.
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
I apologize and retract the statement. I was out of line and I promised to be more respectful to the Court in the future.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 09:20 p.m.
As I thought
Richo
Richo 2024-12-26 09:20 p.m.
Familiarize yourself with the chamber-information rules
RichoRicho
As I thought
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-26 09:22 p.m.
Now do you have an estimation of when we can expect consideration of the motion?
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Now do you have an estimation of when we can expect consideration of the motion?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 10:57 a.m.
Have you familiarized yourself with the chamber rules?
RichoRicho
Have you familiarized yourself with the chamber rules?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 11:21 a.m.
I have, and as I understand the rules none of them preclude me from simply asking about the timing of the motion. I am not asking anything unreasonable, nor have I done so in a disrespectful tone. I am merely asking when we can expect you to rule on, or acknowledge our motion. As it stands you have yet to even say that it would be considered. This motion is integral to our defense strategy and how we'll proceed in responding to the civil complaint, so it's an extremely important issue.

The rules of judicial ethics require you to dispose promptly of the business in front of you, if you are unable to do so, we understand, but we'd request recusal, so this matter doesn't sit for two weeks.
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
I have, and as I understand the rules none of them preclude me from simply asking about the timing of the motion. I am not asking anything unreasonable, nor have I done so in a dis...
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 11:22 a.m.
Did you familiarize yourself with the chamber rules or not?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 11:24 a.m.
I informed your honor that I had, those were the first two words of my statement, I apologize if it was not clear.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 12:50 p.m.
Hello. @ryan
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 01:01 p.m.
Helol.
ArthurArthur
Helol.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 02:13 p.m.
Hello
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:36 p.m.
@ryan I have a few questions
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:37 p.m.
hi
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:38 p.m.
The Pl.'s complaint alleges death resulting from the Def's actions. Are you disputing that the Plaintiff's death does not constitute "concrete injury" or are you arguing that the Def's actions does not legally establish duty, breach or causation? @ryan
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:38 p.m.
Please do not tell me you're adjudicating this motion?
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:38 p.m.
@Richo
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:38 p.m.
Will ask the questions then.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:38 p.m.
Since you have a problem with that.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 04:39 p.m.
Proceed, you already have the notes of what needs to be found out here @Arthur
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 04:41 p.m.
My law clerk is assisting the court by gathering relevant information which is entirely appropriate. I will be adjucating on this matter as I always have.
ArthurArthur
The Pl.'s complaint alleges death resulting from the Def's actions. Are you disputing that the Plaintiff's death does not constitute "concrete injury" or are you arguing that the D...
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:45 p.m.
If you'll read the motion properly, I think it touches on your question. The crux of the motion is that the Plaintiff has not alleged facts sufficient to warrant standing to sue, constitutional significance, prudential standing under a normal interpretation of the statute, or facts sufficient to warrant a claim of wrongful death. All of this stems from the claim that the facts do not support a cognizable constitutional claim.
RichoRicho
My law clerk is assisting the court by gathering relevant information which is entirely appropriate. I will be adjucating on this matter as I always have.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:46 p.m.
I understand that, but you must understand that from my perspective it seemed the law clerk was about to dispose of this matter, which is something unfair to my client.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 04:48 p.m.
The clerk has never disposed of a matter without my authority
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:48 p.m.
I understand completely now, I merely wanted to clarify that this was not the case.
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
I understand that, but you must understand that from my perspective it seemed the law clerk was about to dispose of this matter, which is something unfair to my client.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:54 p.m.
I was asking a question. Nowhere did I indicate as such.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:55 p.m.
And as we said the misunderstanding was cleared up. Do you have any other questions relating to the motion, so that we might dispose of it promptly and not waste time on moot issues?
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:55 p.m.
The issue wasn't moot until you answered my question.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:55 p.m.
And then I did, and your honor clarified.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:56 p.m.
And then I explained from my perspective and offered an answer to your question.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 04:57 p.m.
Are there any residuals to take care of, or can we move on?
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 04:59 p.m.
@nauvelty
ArthurArthur
@nauvelty
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
Ma'am, I feel highly disrespected based on your not responding to my question.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
I am a sir.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
Apologies, sir.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
And I'm re-reading your complaint.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
You say I've missed it but I simply don't see it in there.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
I did not file a complaint.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:01 p.m.
MtD*
ArthurArthur
You say I've missed it but I simply don't see it in there.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:02 p.m.
no there was a part on concrete injury from his mtd
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:02 p.m.
i remember
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:02 p.m.
I believe that that question is based on a misreading of the motion.
nauveltynauvelty
no there was a part on concrete injury from his mtd
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:02 p.m.
I'm not denying that, but it all stems from the lack of constitutional injury
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:02 p.m.
Death is not injury in your view?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:03 p.m.
Not if it is reasonable use of force, which the complaint alleges it is not.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:03 p.m.
Any officer may use lethal force and cause no constitutional injury.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:03 p.m.
@nauvelty Do you contest that?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:03 p.m.
I don't think that's contestable, sir.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:03 p.m.
Let him speak.
ArthurArthur
@nauvelty Do you contest that?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:04 p.m.
yes, the lethal force was excessive and unnecessary
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:05 p.m.
do you want me to elaborate further
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:05 p.m.
Yes please.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:06 p.m.
well the complaint, under the cause of action, had challenged the reasonableness of the defendants use of lethal force as was outlined in tennesse v. garner: the defendants use of lethal force was a clear constitutional injury towards the plaintiff
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:06 p.m.
if it didnt i'd like to clear that up now
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:07 p.m.
If I may
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:07 p.m.
and obviously we all know death is the most ultimate and concrete injury
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:07 p.m.
Before we continue, do you both have any issue with me asking questions. @nauvelty @ryan
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:07 p.m.
Alternatively, we can wait for Hon. Richo.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:08 p.m.
No, as long as you understand the premise of the motions and the associated rules of proceedure, this is fine.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:08 p.m.
@nauvelty
ArthurArthur
@nauvelty
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:09 p.m.
i dont mind waiting
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:09 p.m.
Respectfully, that is not what I asked
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:09 p.m.
We can wait for Hon Richo in that case.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:09 p.m.
essentially i don't really care, so i don't have any issue with you asking questions
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:09 p.m.
nor do i have an issue with waiting for his liege richocaldwell
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:10 p.m.
Seems superfluous.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:10 p.m.
@Arthur Will your asking questions speed up disposition of the motion?
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:11 p.m.
Perhaps, if I get the answers I'm looking for. But due to your * communication outside of these channels I am reluctant to step in anymore.(edited)
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:11 p.m.
I have not committed one instance of ex parte communications.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:11 p.m.
If you could explain what you believe that means and where, I am more than able to explain why that is not the case.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:13 p.m.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:13 p.m.
That is not ex parte communication, I am frankly appalled that you believe it is.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:14 p.m.
Ex parte communication covers communications to the judge. I am able to comment on your performance or the merits of this case in ANY channel I choose as long as it is not directed at the judge.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:14 p.m.
If you'd so desire, I can start pinging @nauvelty everytime I mention this case.
ArthurArthur
Click to see attachment.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:14 p.m.
thats not ex parte communication
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:14 p.m.
like holyroman said
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:15 p.m.
i dont even know why we're having this conversation of ex parte communication right now
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:15 p.m.
Yea let's wait for the judge. I have, with all due respect, lost confidence in the ability for you to fairly and reasonable adjudicate this motion.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:15 p.m.
@Arthur
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Yea let's wait for the judge. I have, with all due respect, lost confidence in the ability for you to fairly and reasonable adjudicate this motion.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 05:18 p.m.
likewise
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:18 p.m.
Hi do not ask for things to be expedited then, I'll handle when I'm free @Arthur
RichoRicho
Hi do not ask for things to be expedited then, I'll handle when I'm free @Arthur
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:19 p.m.
I think that it is unreasonable to either subject us to a lower standard of disposition or slow disposition. If these are our two options, we'd frankly want this case to be reassigned.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:20 p.m.
I do not mean any disrespect, this is simply advocation for my client, at this point
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:20 p.m.
Its being slowed due to your preference of not wanting my clerk to assist, I am allowing that request
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:20 p.m.
I would ask that this still be expediently handled as per the requirements of the ethics code.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:20 p.m.
As reasonably as possible for you, your honor
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:20 p.m.
I will not put this case above standards to be expedited(edited)
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
It will be handled as any other normal case
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
If i may, what standards?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
I am not requesting anything else.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
I am simply requesting proper adjudication which so requires prompt disposition of these matters.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
This isn't an interrogation
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
I will get to this case when I can
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
Do not continue pestering me about it
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
We'd ask for recusal then.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:21 p.m.
To the point where you're on the verge of contempt
RichoRicho
To the point where you're on the verge of contempt
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:22 p.m.
If I may ask, which rule have I violated, so I know exactly what to avoid?
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
We'd ask for recusal then.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:22 p.m.
Denied
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
If I may ask, which rule have I violated, so I know exactly what to avoid?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:25 p.m.
The statement you made which was asked to be retracted
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:26 p.m.
Now again, do not continue pestering the Courts for special privileges and wait until I review your motion.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:26 p.m.
I retracted and apologized to this Court, I don't understand why that would put me close to contempt?
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
I retracted and apologized to this Court, I don't understand why that would put me close to contempt?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:26 p.m.
The latter would have been a contempt hearing
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 05:27 p.m.
End of discussion until I review the motion
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:27 p.m.
But I believe that violation of rules is fundementally moot. Is there another rule, so that I might not offend the nature of the court.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 05:27 p.m.
Yes your honor
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 05:38 p.m.
OK
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:04 p.m.
@ryan
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:04 p.m.
I am here, your honor.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:07 p.m.
@Richo
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:50 p.m.
@Richo I would like to bring to your attention and the attention of @nauvelty that a man claiming to be from your chambers has DM'd me with an 'important message.'
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@Richo I would like to bring to your attention and the attention of @nauvelty that a man claiming to be from your chambers has DM'd me with an 'important...
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 06:50 p.m.
who
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
One suhpea
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@Richo I would like to bring to your attention and the attention of @nauvelty that a man claiming to be from your chambers has DM'd me with an 'important...
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
Does the man claiming to be from chambers happen to be Divine or myself?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
Those are the only two
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
One suhpea
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
idk who he is
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
Suhpea?
RichoRicho
Does the man claiming to be from chambers happen to be Divine or myself?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
It does not, however, I think it is noteworthy.
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
Noted
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
Not relevant however
Arthur
Arthur 2024-12-27 06:51 p.m.
I like subpoena's.
RichoRicho
Not relevant however
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:52 p.m.
I would think it is, but cool.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:52 p.m.
May I ask what the Court's purpose in pinging me was?
Richo
Richo 2024-12-27 06:52 p.m.
Yes I am going over something, I'll continue it soon
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2024-12-27 06:52 p.m.
Okay perfect
RichoRicho
Yes I am going over something, I'll continue it soon
nauvelty
nauvelty 2024-12-30 02:48 p.m.
@Richo
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-02 11:49 a.m.
@Richo may we get that ruling on the mtd soon
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-02 06:51 p.m.
@Richo
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-02 06:51 p.m.
You've been served
nauveltynauvelty
@Richo may we get that ruling on the mtd soon
Richo
Richo 2025-01-03 11:24 a.m.
Yes, due to the request of the defendant not wanting the Clerk involved here it may take a while until I fully review without the support of Court staff
RichoRicho
Yes, due to the request of the defendant not wanting the Clerk involved here it may take a while until I fully review without the support of Court staff
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-03 02:26 p.m.
See above.
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@krabz @Born
Richo
Richo 2025-01-03 02:49 p.m.
Motion denied, full ruling with details to come soon.
RichoRicho
Motion denied, full ruling with details to come soon.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-03 03:54 p.m.
How soon? We are fully intent on appealing the decision.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-05 04:44 a.m.
@Richo your majesty can we get a full ruling today or tomorrow?
nauveltynauvelty
@Richo your majesty can we get a full ruling today or tomorrow?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-07 02:57 p.m.
@Richo
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-07 05:10 p.m.
@Richo if you're going LoA I request recusal/reassignment so we could, perhaps, get an actual ruling on this
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@Richo if you're going LoA I request recusal/reassignment so we could, perhaps, get an actual ruling on this
Richo
Richo 2025-01-07 05:12 p.m.
See chamber-information, not full LOA.
Richo
Richo 2025-01-07 05:12 p.m.
I will be handling remaining cases
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-07 05:13 p.m.
As long as you intend to give a ruling sure
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-07 05:13 p.m.
We're 15 days into the motion
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-11 03:00 p.m.
@Richo your honour can we PLEASE get a full ruling on the motion to dismiss and move on in the proceedings(edited)
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-11 11:39 p.m.
@nauvelty hate to say it but i am dragging this to the SC is jhe rules...ur not moviung to proceedings ever kdi.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-12 05:02 a.m.
@Richo if his honour doesnt have any time to preside over this case, the plaintiff suggests he recuse himself and have the case reassigned to another judge in another docket
nauveltynauvelty
@Richo if his honour doesnt have any time to preside over this case, the plaintiff suggests he recuse himself and have the case reassigned to another judge in anothe...
Richo
Richo 2025-01-12 07:55 a.m.
I've already made it clear I'm not recusing and my LOA is not fully.
RichoRicho
I've already made it clear I'm not recusing and my LOA is not fully.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-12 12:26 p.m.
then would his honour graciously expedite posting the ruling and so we can move on in the proceedings
Richo
Richo 2025-01-15 11:23 a.m.
Thank you for your patience, I'll have it re-assigned to speed things up
Richo
Richo 2025-01-15 11:23 a.m.
CC: @shah
shah
shah 2025-01-15 11:33 a.m.
New judge @morale
shah
shah 2025-01-15 11:33 a.m.
All parties of record
@nauvelty @ryan @goodness gracious @Born
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@krabz @Born
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-15 01:30 p.m.
@morale we'd ask you to reconsider the motion
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-18 04:13 a.m.
@morale
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-20 03:08 p.m.
@morale
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-20 03:08 p.m.
this is getting worse than richo.
shah
shah 2025-01-21 04:22 p.m.
you hated on divine... :🤷‍♂️:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-22 01:00 p.m.
yeah, can we get this reassigned to another judge @shah
shah
shah 2025-01-22 02:10 p.m.
ask clerk
shah
shah 2025-01-22 02:10 p.m.
or chief judg
shahshah
you hated on divine... :🤷‍♂️:
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-22 02:24 p.m.
Well he was slow actually
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-22 02:25 p.m.
Lucas is slow physically
shahshah used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-01-22 02:25 p.m.
Case Modified
@shah has added @acerxtro to the case channel.
shah
shah 2025-01-22 02:25 p.m.
@acerxtro
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-22 02:26 p.m.
@acerxtro hey bby
acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-01-22 02:38 p.m.
hello
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-22 05:29 p.m.
wallahi finally :🙏:
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
@krabz @Born
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-22 10:51 p.m.
@acerxtro could we get a review on this
acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-01-22 10:51 p.m.
possibly
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-22 10:52 p.m.
What would turn that possibility to a yes
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
What would turn that possibility to a yes
acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-01-22 10:54 p.m.
let me take a glance at it
acerxtroacerxtro
let me take a glance at it
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-24 03:37 a.m.
How's the glance going?
acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-01-24 06:17 p.m.
sorry I am recusing due to COI w/ ridgevilleborn
acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-01-24 06:18 p.m.
@ryan @nauvelty
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-24 06:42 p.m.
:😭: been swapped around 3 judges
Richo
Richo 2025-01-24 08:29 p.m.
You're back with me @ryan
Richo
Richo 2025-01-24 08:29 p.m.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-24 08:44 p.m.
oh my goodness
Arthur
Arthur 2025-01-24 08:48 p.m.
Hello and welcome back @ryan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-01-24 08:48 p.m.
Lets deal with this promptly!
Arthur
Arthur 2025-01-24 08:48 p.m.
@nauvelty
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-24 11:11 p.m.
Once a ruling is out we'll appeal
RichoRicho
You're back with me @ryan
Arthur
Arthur 2025-01-25 10:09 a.m.
OK. @ryan
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Richo
Richo 2025-01-25 12:44 p.m.
Richo
Richo 2025-01-25 12:44 p.m.
@ryan
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-25 03:56 p.m.
Notice of appeal 2day
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-26 11:28 p.m.
well not really
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-26 11:28 p.m.
probably tmr if i am being honest
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-27 02:16 p.m.
i came i saw i came again :🤤:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-01-27 02:17 p.m.
wait wrong server
Arthur
Arthur 2025-01-27 07:09 p.m.
Lets continue
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-29 03:49 p.m.
PWC today!!
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-29 03:49 p.m.
yipeee
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-29 03:49 p.m.
@nauvelty are u ready for the SC
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-29 09:47 p.m.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-01-29 09:47 p.m.
@nauvelty @Richo
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Click to see attachment.
Arthur
Arthur 2025-02-03 05:36 p.m.
Ok but we're still continuing.
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-03 05:59 p.m.
We're waiting on you
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-03 05:59 p.m.
Unsure if you know this
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-02-19 03:55 p.m.
sitting here for 16 days
Toby
Toby 2025-02-24 05:31 p.m.
@Richo
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-02-26 05:49 p.m.
@Richo this is getting ridiculous
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-02-27 03:48 p.m.
:😑:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-03 04:52 p.m.
@Richo
HolyRomanRyanHolyRomanRyan
Click to see attachment.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-03 04:53 p.m.
please im begging you
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-03 04:53 p.m.
its ridiculous its taken a month for something to be done
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-03 07:09 p.m.
Hey
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-03 07:09 p.m.
/wave
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-07 07:01 a.m.
@Richo
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-08 10:33 p.m.
@Kezzera
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-08 10:33 p.m.
hi
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-08 10:33 p.m.
can we get a reassignment
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-08 10:33 p.m.
this is insane
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-03-08 11:06 p.m.
oh hell what happened here
KezzeraKezzera
oh hell what happened here
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-09 06:04 p.m.
Richo has neglected us for 3 months
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-09 06:04 p.m.
Could we get literally anyone else???
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-03-09 07:07 p.m.
Marked
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-03-09 08:09 p.m.
@honkhonk This case should be reassigned
honkhonk
honkhonk 2025-03-09 08:21 p.m.
I shall be reassigning this momentarily
honkhonkhonkhonk
I shall be reassigning this momentarily
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-10 11:09 a.m.
pls do
honkhonk
honkhonk 2025-03-10 04:56 p.m.
I have assigned this case to the Honorable Judge Singhski.
cc: @singhski
honkhonk
honkhonk 2025-03-10 04:57 p.m.
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CV-0077-24 spencerpootis15 v. RidgevilleBorn

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned: RichoCornwall

Complaint Attached: Yes

---

UPCOMING COURT DATES



PAST COURT EVENTS



PARTIES**

```
Complaint -- spencerpootis15
Defen...
Labels
Civil
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-11 03:41 a.m.
@singhski i withdraw as counsel
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-11 03:41 a.m.
Defendant has been given instruction on how to proceed with SGO
singhski
singhski 2025-03-11 11:46 a.m.
@nauvelty where are we with this?
singhski
singhski 2025-03-11 11:46 a.m.
@ryan Who is replacing you?
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 11:49 a.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @nauvelty to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-03-11 11:49 a.m.
@nauvelty
singhskisinghski
@nauvelty
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-11 11:51 a.m.
original counsel (HRR) filed a PWC after his mtd was denied; discovery has not yet occurwd
RichoRicho
Click to see attachment.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-11 11:55 a.m.
ruling is here ^^^
singhskisinghski
@ryan Who is replacing you?
HolyRomanRyan
HolyRomanRyan 2025-03-11 11:58 a.m.
@Nicklaus
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-11 05:01 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Nicklaus to the case channel.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-11 08:26 p.m.
he hit the officer and flung him into the air but NO lethal force was NOT objectively reasonable
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-11 08:29 p.m.
sorry for my outburst your honor
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-11 08:29 p.m.
we will have a responsive pleading soon(edited)
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-13 05:27 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-13 05:27 p.m.
@nauvelty @singhski
nauveltynauvelty
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-13 05:33 p.m.
unsure if defence counsel saw the amended complaint attached to the card: this issue was already resolved by the court
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-13 05:33 p.m.
the issue is not solved
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-13 05:36 p.m.
nvm disregard i js saw what you're talking abt
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-13 05:38 p.m.
regardless will be filing opposition to the motion in timely fashion
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-13 05:44 p.m.
u can submit an amended complaint instead of a opposition and then i could file an answer and then we could open discovery
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-13 05:44 p.m.
:😃:
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-13 05:45 p.m.
siggy say less
nauveltynauvelty
regardless will be filing opposition to the motion in timely fashion
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-14 05:00 p.m.
hi
nauveltynauvelty
regardless will be filing opposition to the motion in timely fashion
singhski
singhski 2025-03-15 04:26 a.m.
Hi!
singhskisinghski
Hi!
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-15 04:33 a.m.
hi sending in like 2 hours
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-15 04:33 a.m.
im doing chem tuition
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-15 03:26 p.m.
for someone who was zippy to get this case on the move
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-15 03:26 p.m.
they sure arent reciprocating !
nauveltynauvelty
hi sending in like 2 hours
singhski
singhski 2025-03-15 03:30 p.m.
Why are you doing charity with both your time and mine?
singhski
singhski 2025-03-15 03:31 p.m.
Are you the landlord of lateness?
singhski
singhski 2025-03-15 03:31 p.m.
Your watch must be running on generator
singhski
singhski 2025-03-15 03:32 p.m.
As far as I'm concerned this is not a night vigil o
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-15 07:51 p.m.
@singhski we'd like a paperless order on the motion to strike until you have time to provide a paper opinion (if any)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-15 07:51 p.m.
the time to file an opposition has come and gone
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-15 07:52 p.m.
he was even given fair opportunity to submit an amended complaint and not an opposition, but he did not
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-16 04:52 a.m.
@singhski @Nicklaus apologies, i thought id have time to send amended complaint yesterday BUT it was my sisters birthday so i had no time to send
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-16 04:53 a.m.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-16 04:53 a.m.
filed in <#1349633434955550771>
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 08:55 a.m.
@nauvelty I thought you were going to file opposition to the motion?
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 08:57 a.m.
So now your eyes have seen what your mouth has caused.
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 08:57 a.m.
Now you are seeing that pepper is not sugar.
singhskisinghski
@nauvelty I thought you were going to file opposition to the motion?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-16 08:59 a.m.
nauveltynauvelty
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 09:00 a.m.
Although this is accepted since no responsive pleading was filed, @Nicklaus you have 7 days.
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 09:02 a.m.
or rather 10 days
nauveltynauvelty
Click to see attachment.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-16 09:02 a.m.
if we analyse the connotations of "siggy say less", the verb "say" conveys to the reader the intent for speech, while the noun "less" describes a lack of something. here, the writer, axlrod_x, aims to convey his intent to respond positively to what "nicklaus_s" has said, and thus telling him to "say less", suggesting his agreement in filing "an answer" in order to open discovery.

I hope I helped you with analyzing your screenshot! Send me more screenshots that you want analyzing for a Grade 9, GCSE analysis to help with your English Literature!
singhskisinghski
or rather 10 days
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 09:02 a.m.
Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 17(a)
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-16 11:17 a.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-16 11:17 a.m.
@nauvelty @singhski
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-16 11:19 a.m.
we will have interrogatories once discovery opens
singhski
singhski 2025-03-16 02:51 p.m.
Cc: @nauvelty @Nicklaus

MINUTE ORDER ESTABLISHING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY TIMELINES
The pretrial has officially started and will end on March 26, 2025 at 12:00 p.m., pretrial motions must be filed in accordance with this order barring extension for a cause or other unforeseen delay. Pretrial motions may be submitted only 48 hours before the pretrial is over. Final drafts of exhibit and witness lists must be submitted by March 21, 2025 at 12:00 p.m.. Responses to pretrial motions must be filed within 48 hours of the motion being made. Any motions filed outside of the assigned timeframes will not be permitted.

/s/ Singhski
District Court Judge
(edited)
singhskisinghski
Although this is accepted since no responsive pleading was filed, @Nicklaus you have 7 days.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-17 08:00 p.m.
so just for the record is the motion to strike denied as moot
NicklausNicklaus
so just for the record is the motion to strike denied as moot
singhski
singhski 2025-03-18 02:35 p.m.
Yes
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-20 10:11 a.m.
@nauvelty wheres ur discovery broski
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-20 11:46 a.m.
literally after iftar
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-20 11:46 a.m.
6pm
nauveltynauvelty
literally after iftar
singhski
singhski 2025-03-20 04:01 p.m.
Did leave your discovery at suhur?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-21 02:40 a.m.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-21 02:52 a.m.
filed
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-21 02:52 a.m.
singhskisinghski
Cc: @nauvelty @Nicklaus MINUTE ORDER ESTABLISHING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY TIMELINES The pretrial has officially started and will end on <t:1743004800:f...(edited)
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-21 03:12 p.m.
@Nicklaus :😔:
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-21 03:14 p.m.
yeah you provided me with the discovery for your claim, and indeed, a video of the incident, 9 hours before the deadline(edited)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-21 03:15 p.m.
@singhski I’ll need an extension to discovery
NicklausNicklaus
@singhski I’ll need an extension to discovery
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-22 03:10 a.m.
it takes like 5 minutes maximum out of ur time
singhski
singhski 2025-03-22 09:56 a.m.
Sure, @Nicklaus
singhski
singhski 2025-03-22 09:56 a.m.
Discovery deadline is extended to (Monday, March 24, 2025 at 12:00 p.m.)
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-24 01:30 p.m.
@Nicklaus past the deadline for a document
singhski
singhski 2025-03-24 02:48 p.m.
@Nicklaus Why?
singhskisinghski
@Nicklaus Why?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 04:05 p.m.
I’ve been at school all day
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 04:36 p.m.
i wasnt on discord until after the deadline, so i couldn't much get someone from the doj to do it either
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 04:36 p.m.
i can submit a pdf now that im home
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 04:37 p.m.
but if it is denied then it doesn't much matter because this can and should be resolved on summary judgment
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 04:38 p.m.
ive been spending more time drafting a sj motion than drafting discovery
NicklausNicklaus
I’ve been at school all day
singhski
singhski 2025-03-24 05:34 p.m.
You had Sunday. Are you a choir boy?
singhskisinghski
You had Sunday. Are you a choir boy?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 05:42 p.m.
i do stuff on the weekends yes
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 05:43 p.m.
but like i said i was drafting a sj motion instead of discovery
NicklausNicklaus
but like i said i was drafting a sj motion instead of discovery
singhski
singhski 2025-03-24 05:57 p.m.
I’m sure you have plenty of people working in your office, why didn’t you pawn it off to them?
singhskisinghski
I’m sure you have plenty of people working in your office, why didn’t you pawn it off to them?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 05:58 p.m.
brenda is the only person who works in my office, and she lives across the world from me
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 05:58 p.m.
i explained why i didn't pawn it off today
singhski
singhski 2025-03-24 05:59 p.m.
Okay, you have until the end of the day EST, no more extensions will be entertained.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 05:59 p.m.
thank you your honor
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 11:50 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 11:51 p.m.
@singhski can we get updated pretrial dates
NicklausNicklaus
I’ve been at school all day
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-25 09:10 a.m.
missed the chance for elite tiktok knowledge
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-25 09:10 a.m.
jobs bro jobs :🥀: :🥀:
NicklausNicklaus
@singhski can we get updated pretrial dates
singhski
singhski 2025-03-25 03:47 p.m.
March 29, 2025 at 12:00 p.m.
singhskisinghski
March 29, 2025 at 12:00 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 10:52 a.m.
can this be extended 12 hrs
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 10:52 a.m.
end of day Saturday est
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 10:53 a.m.
:🥀:
NicklausNicklaus
can this be extended 12 hrs
singhski
singhski 2025-03-26 11:01 a.m.
I have no problems with this, @nauvelty any objections?
singhskisinghski
I have no problems with this, @nauvelty any objections?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-26 11:45 a.m.
me neither: im off to berlin tomorrow and wont be back until 29th
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-26 11:45 a.m.
so no objections
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-03-26 11:45 a.m.
very convenient for me
NicklausNicklaus
can this be extended 12 hrs
singhski
singhski 2025-03-26 12:26 p.m.
Extension granted
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-29 04:45 p.m.
sigh!
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-29 04:45 p.m.
i move for another extension for a day or two
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-29 04:45 p.m.
the motion is done for the most part, i just need to do one more factor and add record cites
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-29 04:46 p.m.
im just not sure if ill be home tomorrow
NicklausNicklaus
i move for another extension for a day or two
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-29 04:46 p.m.
@singhski @nauvelty
NicklausNicklaus
@singhski @nauvelty
singhski
singhski 2025-03-29 05:46 p.m.
One day
singhski
singhski 2025-03-29 05:46 p.m.
No more
singhski
singhski 2025-03-30 10:21 a.m.
@Nicklaus Due today by fire by force
singhskisinghski
@Nicklaus Due today by fire by force
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-30 10:57 a.m.
will submit this afternoon
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-30 10:57 a.m.
im going out
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-30 10:05 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-03-30 10:05 p.m.
@singhski @nauvelty
singhski
singhski 2025-04-02 11:41 a.m.
@nauvelty When can I expect your response?
singhskisinghski
@nauvelty When can I expect your response?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-02 12:12 p.m.
this weekend maybe but after this the court cant expect me to answer promptly: my gcses would be less than a month away and so all my attention would be devoted towards my studies
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-02 12:14 p.m.
i hope this court would be able to understand the constraint id be under if i was expected to present my case during trial while simultaneously sitting the british equivalent of the SATS (gcses)
nauveltynauvelty
this weekend maybe but after this the court cant expect me to answer promptly: my gcses would be less than a month away and so all my attention would be devoted towards my studies
singhski
singhski 2025-04-02 01:10 p.m.
Perhaps it would be in the best interest of your client that you don't represent him?
singhskisinghski
Perhaps it would be in the best interest of your client that you don't represent him?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-03 05:06 p.m.
your honour, my client has already expressed his intent in keeping me as his counsel privately, and the fact he doesn't mind this case being delayed for longer. with this in mind, i ask the court to stay the proceedings from the 12th may to 12th june, a month, at the very least for my gcses, unless you want this as a formal motion in which case i can file that motion alongside the opposition to this summary judgement
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-03 05:07 p.m.
and i think the defendant would agree with this considering exam season in general is coming up: roblox court should not take precedent over irl grades
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-03 05:07 p.m.
you included king singhski
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:29 p.m.
we object
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:29 p.m.
this was filed in December of last year
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:30 p.m.
my client doesn’t even remember what happened
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:30 p.m.
if we’re going to stay this for a month then it might as well just be dismissed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:30 p.m.
and your gcses take a MONTH?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:33 p.m.
i have ACTs Wednesday but I would never suggest my hobby court proceeding be stayed for a month because of that
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-03 11:34 p.m.
we very much mind that this has taken months, even if your client doesn’t
NicklausNicklaus
and your gcses take a MONTH?
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 01:27 a.m.
yes they take a month because gcses actually mean something
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 01:27 a.m.
keep in mind they’re far different from the american sats
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 01:28 a.m.
english, maths, french, bio, physics, chemistry, and three other chosen subjects
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 01:30 a.m.
and they arent multiple choice they’re questions which require written responses to them
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 01:42 a.m.
that being said, the fact your client doesnt remember what happened is their problem and would suggest they spend time reviewing the case with you, to dismiss this case is unfair and in any case an attempt at avoiding a legitimate resolution in the matter

to deny this request to stay sets a highly dangerous precedent, it allows courts to jeopardise irl exams that are going to determine what colleges and unis people get into because the defendant believes that a hobby court shouldnt be set aside for something that determines your entire future
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-04 08:01 a.m.
Review the case with me? It’s been 117 days since the shooting? If you can’t represent your client, then withdraw
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-04 08:01 a.m.
this doesn’t need stayed for 30 days
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-04 08:02 a.m.
I hear you about the exams but over 100 days and we aren’t even out of pretrial is absurd
nauveltynauvelty
your honour, my client has already expressed his intent in keeping me as his counsel privately, and the fact he doesn't mind this case being delayed for longer. with this in mind, ...
singhski
singhski 2025-04-04 12:16 p.m.
By then, 186 days would have passed since the incident
NicklausNicklaus
this doesn’t need stayed for 30 days
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 12:42 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-04 12:43 p.m.
So drop the case or find substitute counsel
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 12:43 p.m.
we are NOT dropping the case
nauvelty
nauvelty 2025-04-04 12:43 p.m.
you can settle with us and avoid having to wait even longer :🤷‍♂️:
nauveltynauvelty
you can settle with us and avoid having to wait even longer :🤷‍♂️:
singhski
singhski 2025-04-04 01:37 p.m.
Who told you we are waiting?
singhskisinghski
Who told you we are waiting?
singhski
singhski 2025-04-04 01:45 p.m.
Are you the president of presumptions?
singhski
singhski 2025-04-06 07:03 a.m.
@Nicklaus It appears he has left everything
singhski
singhski 2025-04-09 01:59 p.m.
@Born Who is representing you now?
singhskisinghski
@Born Who is representing you now?
singhski
singhski 2025-04-12 10:34 a.m.
@Born
singhski
singhski 2025-04-12 10:34 a.m.
Are you going ahead with this or shall I assume you have abandoned the case and dismiss it?
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-12 02:11 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Born to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-04-12 02:11 p.m.
@Born
Born
Born 2025-04-12 02:24 p.m.
I wasn't aware that he left
Born
Born 2025-04-12 02:25 p.m.
So i'm unsure what I need to do to find another person to represent me
Born
Born 2025-04-12 02:25 p.m.
tbh it's kind of ridiculous that this case is somehow still going on..
singhskisinghski
@Born Who is representing you now?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-13 12:17 a.m.
this is the defendant
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-13 12:17 a.m.
we move to dismiss with prejudice
NicklausNicklaus
we move to dismiss with prejudice
singhski
singhski 2025-04-13 03:44 a.m.
I'll put this on paper later
singhski
singhski 2025-04-13 11:22 a.m.
@goodness gracious Who is your attorney sir?
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-13 11:22 a.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @goodness gracious to the case channel.
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-13 05:03 p.m.
only just saw that he disappeared from the server completely out of nowhere I’ll get a new one asap
goodness graciousgoodness gracious
only just saw that he disappeared from the server completely out of nowhere I’ll get a new one asap
singhski
singhski 2025-04-14 08:05 a.m.
How soon is ASAP?
singhskisinghski
How soon is ASAP?
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-14 08:07 a.m.
as soon as this lawyer responds to me
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-14 08:07 a.m.
i am dming him now
singhski
singhski 2025-04-16 05:22 a.m.
@goodness gracious
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-16 05:24 a.m.
hey
goodness graciousgoodness gracious
hey
singhski
singhski 2025-04-16 05:26 a.m.
What's going on? It's been 2 days, are you interested in this case?
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-16 05:27 a.m.
yea I’m getting a lawyer my ticket is open in their discord right now
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-16 05:27 a.m.
what’s the rush the case has already been up for over 120 days
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-16 05:27 a.m.
and the guy disappeared with no warning
goodness graciousgoodness gracious
what’s the rush the case has already been up for over 120 days
singhski
singhski 2025-04-16 05:30 a.m.
It shouldn't be
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-16 05:42 a.m.
yeah
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-17 12:58 a.m.
I am talking to lawyer now btw
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-17 12:58 a.m.
we are conversing some might say
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-20 09:00 a.m.
@goodness gracious @singhski
shah
shah 2025-04-20 03:38 p.m.
@goodness gracious reply or dismissal
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 03:52 p.m.
hello
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 03:52 p.m.
you ping me while i was asleep
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:08 p.m.
@goodness gracious We're going to go ahead and dismiss
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:08 p.m.
why
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:09 p.m.
case gets kept up for like 130 days my lawyer disappears i don't get given sufficient time to find a new lawyer
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:09 p.m.
corrupt
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:09 p.m.
You've had a week to find a new lawyer
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:09 p.m.
you do understand i literally cannot pay a new lawyer because the devs disabled sending money for tourists right
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:09 p.m.
not my fault a game function restricts me from continuing this
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:10 p.m.
Your lawyer should understand that
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:10 p.m.
my lawyer randomly left probably due to being tired of the case not being dealt with
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:10 p.m.
what i don't understand is case gets left up for over 130 days and absolutely nothing happens my lawyer leaves and suddenly all this is happening?
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:10 p.m.
like what
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:10 p.m.
I'm not going to concern my self with the payment plans devised by lawyers
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:11 p.m.
yea except its not anything to do with that its the fact i physically CANNOT
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:11 p.m.
because of the restrictions devs have put into place for exploiters
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:11 p.m.
Again, your lawyer must understand that, and provide representation regardless
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:11 p.m.
The gears of the judicial system are still running, new cases are being filed daily
singhskisinghski
Again, your lawyer must understand that, and provide representation regardless
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:12 p.m.
or perhaps receive payment after the restriction is lifted
singhskisinghski
Again, your lawyer must understand that, and provide representation regardless
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:12 p.m.
ok well do you want me to try dm a 9th lawyer about it
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:12 p.m.
most people typically won't do a job without payment first
goodness graciousgoodness gracious
ok well do you want me to try dm a 9th lawyer about it
singhski
singhski 2025-04-20 04:13 p.m.
You have to show some sort of desire to keep this case running, you only seem to show that desire when prompted
singhskisinghski
You have to show some sort of desire to keep this case running, you only seem to show that desire when prompted
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:13 p.m.
im pretty sure the desire was my lawyer trying to get the case dealt with for over 130 days but clearly it didn't get very far for him
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:13 p.m.
i physically cannot show desire to keep it running when i cannot find a lawyer that wants to do it without payment first
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-20 04:13 p.m.
because the devs cannot fix their game
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-21 10:36 a.m.
As of now I am still trying to find someone that would be interested without prior payment
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-25 09:44 p.m.
@singhski we’re going to move to expedite a ruling on our pending summary judgment
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-25 10:45 p.m.
Currently in talks with a lawyer who says he will file. Will explain how the case has been up for over 120 days and see if he’s still interested.
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-26 04:40 a.m.
@singhski My lawyer is @huddy.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-26 11:29 p.m.
it took 20 days to find a laywer?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-26 11:29 p.m.
:/
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-26 11:29 p.m.
he runs like the most popular firm in the state
shah
shah 2025-04-27 01:41 p.m.
Please take notice that I will be assuming responsibility for all pending cases previously assigned to Ret. Judge Singhski. All existing deadlines, motions, and scheduled appearances are hereby extended and granted continuances until 5th May which is when I will be back from exams

Clerkistrate @CashhCuIture is appointed to all cases.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 06:56 p.m.
oh my god
NicklausNicklaus
it took 20 days to find a laywer?
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:52 p.m.
It takes 20 days to find a lawyer when the devs don’t know how to fix their game (tourists being unable to drop or send money) which results in me being unable to pay first which in turn crosses out 90% of firms. Understand this
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:52 p.m.
no I don’t care
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:52 p.m.
it’s been half a year
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:52 p.m.
Not my problem
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:53 p.m.
yes it is
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:53 p.m.
I’ve had a lawyer for over 120 days yet the case was prolonged for such an extent of time he completely left the server
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:53 p.m.
Not my problem the case has been up for this long
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:53 p.m.
Understand this
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:54 p.m.
your lawyer left the case and abandoned u cuz he didn’t wanna deal with this case during exams
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:54 p.m.
Which wouldn’t of happened if the case wasn’t kept up for this amount of time
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:54 p.m.
You’re just going back to square 1 with this
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:54 p.m.
he was partly to blame for that
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
it then took you 20 days to get a lawyer after he left, and you never even tried until prompted over and over again
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
it’s been half a year
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
it is entirely a problem
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
and it is your problem because you are the plaintiff
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
You clearly are just spouting nonsense without knowing what was going on behind the scenes
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
It’s not my problem the devs cannot fix their game which resulted in that
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
I don’t care what was going on behind the scenes
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
You know nothing of what was happening during the time of finding a lawyer so you shouldn’t speak of it
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:55 p.m.
it’s been half a year
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:56 p.m.
So?
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:56 p.m.
Did you not want to keep the case going? Or did your client have another lawyer
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:56 p.m.
You need to understand these things take time
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:56 p.m.
they do take time
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:56 p.m.
not half a year
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:57 p.m.
my client didn’t even remember this by the time I contacted him
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:57 p.m.
it was 100 days by that point
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:57 p.m.
you and your lawyer have a responsibility for this stuff
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:57 p.m.
and your lawyer was to blame (not fully) for the delay before I was here
NicklausNicklaus
and your lawyer was to blame (not fully) for the delay before I was here
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:58 p.m.
Not at all 90% of the time of this case has been switching between judges
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:58 p.m.
he then left this case
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:58 p.m.
which resulted in another 24 days delay
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:58 p.m.
Cases take time if you can’t handle the time they take I recommend you to pursue other careers(edited)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:58 p.m.
you’re not understanding
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:59 p.m.
You’re not understanding that it’s not my problem the devs can’t fix their game which is why it took this time to find a lawyer
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 09:59 p.m.
Good day. I will speak with you later if you wish
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:59 p.m.
but that was only a minute reason for the delay
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:59 p.m.
24 day delay
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 09:59 p.m.
out of the half the year delay
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 10:00 p.m.
the responsibility is on you and your counsel to prosecute this case
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 10:00 p.m.
I understand abandoning the case did not help with that
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 10:00 p.m.
but it has been half a year
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 10:00 p.m.
nobody remembers what happened
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-27 10:48 p.m.
I remember perfectly what happened. If you were to be in my shoes with limited knowledge of lawyer firms and unable to transfer cash first you wouldn’t exactly get a lawyer immediately either.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:22 p.m.
that’s great
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:22 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:23 p.m.
the motion for summary judgment was submitted just under a month ago
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:23 p.m.
get ur show on the road
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:28 p.m.
can someone add @huddy.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-27 11:29 p.m.
@shah @Brenda @sav
NicklausNicklaus
Click to see attachment.
goodness gracious
goodness gracious 2025-04-28 02:04 a.m.
Did I say he remembered? I simply mentioned that I, myself remember perfectly
shah
shah 2025-04-30 06:52 a.m.
Magistrate @Cappyine appointed per 5 M.S.C. 1 § 2202.1
shahshah used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-30 06:52 a.m.
Case Modified
@shah has added @Cappy to the case channel.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 09:30 a.m.
@goodness gracious @Nicklaus Please resubmit or bring to my attention any and all motions that need to be reviewed
CappyCappy
@goodness gracious @Nicklaus Please resubmit or bring to my attention any and all motions that need to be reviewed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-30 12:55 p.m.
still waiting for a response
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 01:53 p.m.
@goodness gracious Okay where are you at with retaining counsel
NicklausNicklaus
still waiting for a response
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 01:54 p.m.
After looking through the history of this case I am willing to be flexible due to the plaintiff's previous representation just leaving with no notice but he needs to retain someone in the next 24 hours
CappyCappy
After looking through the history of this case I am willing to be flexible due to the plaintiff's previous representation just leaving with no notice but he needs to retain someone...
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-30 01:55 p.m.
he has retained @huddy.
NicklausNicklaus
he has retained @huddy.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 01:55 p.m.
Oh I see that, thank you for clarifying.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 01:56 p.m.
@huddy. When can I expect a response?
CappyCappy
@huddy. When can I expect a response?
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-04-30 02:06 p.m.
hes not in the channel i dont think
CappyCappy used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-30 02:23 p.m.
Case Modified
@Cappy has added @huddy. to the case channel.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 02:23 p.m.
@huddy. Hello
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 02:25 p.m.
How long do you need to respond? I won’t fault you obviously for not having previously indicated your intent to respond given you weren’t even added yet
huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
Response tomorrow, out rn
huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:23 p.m.
Please allow until weekend
huddy.huddy.
Please allow until weekend
Cappy
Cappy 2025-04-30 04:56 p.m.
Should I expect it tomorrow or are you asking for Saturday
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-02 06:05 p.m.
@huddy. @Cappy
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-02 06:05 p.m.
might we speed it up
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-02 06:06 p.m.
you've had a week to become acquainted with the case
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-02 06:06 p.m.
where response
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-02 06:06 p.m.
:(
huddy.huddy.
Response tomorrow, out rn
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-02 08:58 p.m.
Ok you have 24 hours before I’m going to rule
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-04 03:43 a.m.
Home in 8 hours, will file then
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-04 02:42 p.m.
Filing rn
huddy.huddy.
Click to see attachment.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-05 10:52 a.m.
Any reason it was late?
CappyCappy
Any reason it was late?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 10:55 a.m.
Wasn't home until then, never filed earlier cuz went to sleep when the 24 hour mark hit
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 10:55 a.m.
Apologies
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 11:58 a.m.
but like you have a whole firm of people and had a week
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 11:58 a.m.
we have a few motions regarding the response before you rule @Cappy
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 11:58 a.m.
but I’m in class rn so I’ll have them later today
NicklausNicklaus
we have a few motions regarding the response before you rule @Cappy
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-05 12:13 p.m.
Noted
NicklausNicklaus
but like you have a whole firm of people and had a week
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 01:31 p.m.
Oh no
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 01:31 p.m.
a. I don't have a 'whole firm of people'
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 01:32 p.m.
b. How are you complaining and trying to get a motion denied due to the fact that it wasn't handed in before your attention span limit
NicklausNicklaus
but I’m in class rn so I’ll have them later today
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 01:32 p.m.
You have a whole department full of people
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 01:32 p.m.
:😲:
CappyCappy
Noted
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:50 p.m.
we’re just going to move for leave to file a reply
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:51 p.m.
i don’t think a motion to strike would be well taken but it is disappointing that this matter has gone on 5 months
NicklausNicklaus
we’re just going to move for leave to file a reply
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:51 p.m.
The court has held in the past that leave is not technically required for a reply
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:51 p.m.
but uhh
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:51 p.m.
it’s not super clear
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:54 p.m.
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CV-0091-25 Velemen v. IT4L14AN

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned: Hon. Judge Nomadity - Courtroom 102

Plaintiff Counsel: davie9000, Esq.

Defendant Counsel: Nicklaus_s, Esq.

---

CLAIMS PRESENTED**

Comments
1
Labels
Civil, Closed, Dismissed w/ Prejudice
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-05 06:54 p.m.
anyways we believe our motion has been misconstrued and believe a reply would serve the court well in making a decision
NicklausNicklaus
we’re just going to move for leave to file a reply
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-05 08:24 p.m.
You can file a reply.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-05 08:24 p.m.
But I hope it actually contains some substance and isn’t just a waste of the courts time
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 12:13 p.m.
@Cappy Your Honor I filed our response almost 3 days ago and the State, with their entire department of personnel, have failed to file any reply or response motion
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 12:13 p.m.
May we move on?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 12:13 p.m.
This case has dragged out long enough
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-07 04:01 p.m.
@Nicklaus you are really testing the courts patience
CappyCappy
@Nicklaus you are really testing the courts patience
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 04:12 p.m.
I’ve been out of state
NicklausNicklaus
I’ve been out of state
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:15 p.m.
Your department has six times more employees than my firm!! How is this not done yet!!
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 04:15 p.m.
i have one other staff member who has submitted a notice of resignation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 04:16 p.m.
please don’t belittle me
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 04:17 p.m.
there was no scheduling order for my reply
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 04:19 p.m.
Just responding with what you've been bugging me with pal
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 05:13 p.m.
im not arguing with you
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 05:13 p.m.
you are being combative for the sake of it
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 05:15 p.m.
you said you would have a response in a day and then ghosted the court for four days while violating a scheduling order even after being retained for over a week :🫠:
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 05:17 p.m.
to the month-old motion in the five-month old case(edited)
NicklausNicklaus
I’ve been out of state
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-07 06:13 p.m.
That isn’t an excuse. I was giving you flexibility but now my hands are tied. Deadline is going to be 48 hours from this message.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-07 06:13 p.m.
Please communicate next time if it’s going to be a very extended period of time.
NicklausNicklaus
you said you would have a response in a day and then ghosted the court for four days while violating a scheduling order even after being retained for over a week :🫠:
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-07 06:14 p.m.
@huddy. Both of you stop bickering please. I know how tempting it is because I loved doing it when I practiced but we need to keep it professional please.
CappyCappy
Please communicate next time if it’s going to be a very extended period of time.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 06:25 p.m.
I’m home now
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 06:25 p.m.
but this was the same excuse James gave
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 06:25 p.m.
anyways I hope to have it in tonight
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 06:25 p.m.
that was my original plan
NicklausNicklaus
anyways I hope to have it in tonight
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-07 10:02 p.m.
3/4 done will submit tmrw
NicklausNicklaus
but this was the same excuse James gave
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-08 01:03 a.m.
And I had the same response
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-09 06:07 p.m.
trying to submit now but uhh
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-09 06:07 p.m.
uno momento
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-09 06:25 p.m.
DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CC: @Cappy @huddy.
(edited)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-09 11:32 p.m.
forgot to add that even if there was a glitch, it won’t preclude summary judgment bcuz it is a fact so credited by the evidence any disagreement won’t matter under scott
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-10 04:45 a.m.
It's like you wrote this reply without even reading the complaint
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-10 04:45 a.m.
Also you keep referring to real life where touching somebody with a car is AWDW but that is completely invalid on Roblox where somebody can be glitched to stand in the middle of a car and there are specifically 'struck' animations placed there by the developers to know when it counts as AWDW and hitting
CappyCappy
@huddy. Both of you stop bickering please. I know how tempting it is because I loved doing it when I practiced but we need to keep it professional please.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-10 10:28 a.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-10 10:28 a.m.
yo Mr dude
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-10 10:32 a.m.
this might be helpful for ya
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:42 a.m.
I didn't realise we were using criminal trials in the district court as precedent :😂:
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-10 10:43 a.m.
An irrelevant one with completely differing facts too
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-10 11:23 a.m.
1. The facts are pretty close to this case. The defendant commanded something from the victim, buttoned their windows, and then made contact with the vehicle (a material fact… admitted by both of us). It was then found that his use of force was objectively reasonable, because of the circumstances.
2. Thank you for recognizing that there is little precedent for this issue particularized here. That doesn’t fare better for you. It just makes it more likely that the law was not clearly established at the time (something you ignore completely in your response) entitling the defendant here to qualified immunity.

"[Clearly established means] existing law must have placed the constitutionality of the officer's conduct 'beyond debate.'" D.C. v. Wesby, 583 U.S. 48, 63 (2018) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741 (2011)).

"The Supreme Court has emphasized, especially in the Fourth Amendment context, that we may not 'define clearly established law at a high level of generality.'" West v. City of Caldwell, 931 F.3d 978, 983 (9th Cir. 2019) (quoting Kisela v. Hughes, 584 U.S. 100, 104 (2018) (per curiam)). "Rather, we must locate a controlling case that 'squarely governs the specific facts at issue,' except in the 'rare obvious case' in which a general legal principle makes the unlawfulness of the officer's conduct clear despite a lack of precedent addressing similar circumstances." Id. (quoting City of Escondido, Cal. v. Emmons, 586 U.S. 38, 42 (2019) (per curiam)).
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-10 11:24 a.m.
I’m not arguing with u more cuz we’re both parroting what has already been briefed on
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-11 07:42 p.m.
@Cappy can we have an estimated time on how long it will take to rule
NicklausNicklaus
@Cappy can we have an estimated time on how long it will take to rule
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-11 11:48 p.m.
It’s going to be some time, I also need to get it signed off
shah
shah 2025-05-24 09:23 a.m.
@Cappy
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 01:53 p.m.
@Cappy @shah
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-27 02:52 p.m.
thats a long ass signature
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-27 02:58 p.m.
Ok let me handle this
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-27 03:11 p.m.
The motion for summary judgement is DENIED. Case will proceed. If someone wants a pdf ruling they can ask for it but if not I'm not going to impede a speedy trial by taking the time to do that.
Cappy
Cappy 2025-05-27 03:12 p.m.
CC: @huddy. @Nicklaus
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 03:12 p.m.
why is it denied
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-27 03:12 p.m.
Thanks
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 03:13 p.m.
nothing about this is speedy so i dont find that reason very compelling
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 03:13 p.m.
we'd ask for a pdf
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 03:13 p.m.
or ur grounds stated on the record
NicklausNicklaus
or ur grounds stated on the record
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 03:35 p.m.
@Cappy
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 04:08 p.m.
nevermind
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-27 04:08 p.m.
@shah @Cappy we move to vacate the order
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-28 06:39 p.m.
@shah Hey
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-29 09:04 p.m.
@shah 2
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-29 09:04 p.m.
@Cappy
shah
shah 2025-05-31 09:19 a.m.
ok @Nicklaus
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
who are you representing @Nicklaus
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
ridgevilleborn yes
shahshah
who are you representing @Nicklaus
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
ridgevill
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
yes sir
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
ok let me review this chat cus i havent even read naything
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:21 p.m.
i rlly just wanna know grounds for denial of sj so i can appeal
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
cuz its QI
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
but nonetheless theres no authority to enter such an order
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
he can only enter a report & recommendation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
we follow the federal system of magistrates
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
where his ruling again
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:22 p.m.
rulings
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:49 p.m.
was he granted qualified immunity by the solicitor general @Nicklaus
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:49 p.m.
i assume your representing the defendant and not the government
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:49 p.m.
what
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:49 p.m.
under what statute
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:49 p.m.
what immunity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:50 p.m.
hes being sued in his individual capacity and SGO offered representation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:50 p.m.
but since i resigned from SGO i continue represneting in my private capacity
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:50 p.m.
NicklausNicklaus
but since i resigned from SGO i continue represneting in my private capacity
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:50 p.m.
ok so the state isn't an intervenor
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:51 p.m.
no
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:51 p.m.
then the motion for summary judgement remains denied
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:51 p.m.
ok why
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:51 p.m.
i will write ruling in a ferw
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:51 p.m.
the SGO never had to defend him
shahshah
Click to see attachment.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:52 p.m.
if ur trying to deny it under this
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:52 p.m.
these SGO statutes dont apply whatsoever
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:52 p.m.
he isnt sued in his official or quasi official capcity
NicklausNicklaus
he isnt sued in his official or quasi official capcity
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:53 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:53 p.m.
he isnt being sued in his official capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:53 p.m.
he was acting under the color of the law, yes
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:54 p.m.
but that doesnt mean he has to be sued in his official capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:54 p.m.
see e.g. tactical_pancakes v. msp
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:54 p.m.
(applying course of proceedings test)
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:54 p.m.
@huddy. verify
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
only your documentation says in his individual capacity
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
the case caption does not
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
the case caption does
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
the government is not named
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:55 p.m.
and the parties section does not say he is sued in official capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:56 p.m.
if he was sued in his official capacity then i would've motion to dismiss his state law claim under sov immunity
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:57 p.m.
ok well lets clarify the record by asking the plaintiff's counsel
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:57 p.m.
and he had private-capacity represnetation at the beignning of the case (holyromanryan)
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:58 p.m.
the complaint alleges official capacity and a duty of care
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:58 p.m.
i am aware that does not necessarily mean that he is being sued in his official capacity but the court will excerise diligence
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:58 p.m.
no relief is sought against the government though
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:58 p.m.
i think just applying the course of proceedings test suffices
shah
shah 2025-05-31 01:58 p.m.
yes but the original and amended complaints have been written by npz_v and since then there has been a substitution of counsel
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:59 p.m.
yes but this case is from december
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:59 p.m.
if we are changing parties now then
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 01:59 p.m.
everything is just covered under statutes of limitation
shah
shah 2025-05-31 02:01 p.m.
the court notes your profuse anger but will wait for mr. @huddy. 's response
shahshah
the court notes your profuse anger but will wait for mr. @huddy. 's response
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 02:13 p.m.
i understand but just so my objection is on the record: what james says doesnt matter

1. "If the denomination of the party defendant by the plaintiff were the sole test of whether a suit was against the officer individually or against his principal, the sovereign, our task would be easy." Larson v. Domestic Foreign Corp, 337 U.S. 682, 687 (1949). "the crucial question is whether the relief sought in a suit nominally addressed to the officer is relief against the sovereign." Id. this suit seeks damages from the officer personally, and does not require the governemnt to take ANY action. "The judgment sought will not require action by the sovereign or disturb the sovereign's property. There is, therefore, no jurisdictional difficulty." Id., at 687-88.

2. also under the course of proceedings test (best articulated by brenda in tactical_pancakes v. msp https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1327680575099895941/1334632984925573273) it is against the officer personally because the relief is sought personally, qualified immunity has been brought as a defense, and because "wrongful death" talks about an "individual"
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:01 p.m.
Home in 30
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:02 p.m.
@shah He is being sued in his official capacity
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:02 p.m.
It's not our decision that Defendant chose private-capacity representation
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:02 p.m.
ok please file an amended complaint clarifying that within 24 hours or the action will be dismissed(edited)
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:06 p.m.
@huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:30 p.m.
Loud and clear
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:34 p.m.
@shah I'm confused
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:35 p.m.
When a complaint is made, and it doesn't say official capacity, it was my impression that in the instance that you wanted it to be in individual capacity, that would be the only time you would specifically go out of the way to say "in his individual capacity"
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:36 p.m.
Our complaint doesn't state in his individual capacity at any point in time, and specifically mentions in the parties section "is a resident of the State of
Mayflower, Clark County and a Master Deputy for the Clark County Sheriff’s Office"

Later in the complaint, it clearly states the following image
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:36 p.m.
the complaint does not specify individual or official capacity(edited)
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:36 p.m.
we have already discussed that above. please amend the complaint accordingly
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
So where do you want me to put this
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
in the title?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
And sorry, I missed that chain of messages
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
amend as necessary including the relief you would like from the government
shah
shah 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
and ask for summons for the appropriate officers
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:05 p.m.
@shah how is he amending the complaint
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:05 p.m.
discovery is completed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:05 p.m.
the pleadings stage has closed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:05 p.m.
like we're way too far into this
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
we are still in pre-trial i would assume since there was a pending judgment on the motion for sj
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
you do know the government wasnt summoned to start with
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
cuz this isnt against the government
shahshah
we are still in pre-trial i would assume since there was a pending judgment on the motion for sj
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
we're not
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
the motion for summary judgment is two months old
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
i am not inclinced to dismiss this as this would just come up again but in a new manifestation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:06 p.m.
this wont come up again bcuz its barred by the statutes of limitations :/
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:07 p.m.
we're too far into be changing and substituting parties
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:07 p.m.
what statue of limitation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:07 p.m.
this doesnt make sense
shahshah
what statue of limitation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:08 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:08 p.m.
you'll find that the actions that gave rise to the complaint occured in december of 2024
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:08 p.m.
and the complaint has been amended since then
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:08 p.m.
so parties should have already been dealt with
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:08 p.m.
its pretty clear that it was individual capcity from the start
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:09 p.m.
like it should've been dealt with when everyone was being summoned
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:09 p.m.
if there was a dispute
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:11 p.m.
also
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-05-31 05:11 p.m.
this seems pretty pertinent
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:13 p.m.
it seems mr laus is correct
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:13 p.m.
do you have any comments before i rule @huddy.
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:14 p.m.
please let me know if you wish to continue to file suit under the (original claims of ??) individual capacity(edited)
shah
shah 2025-05-31 05:14 p.m.
that is a different issue
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 04:58 a.m.
How is it pretty clear that it was individual capacity from the start
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 04:58 a.m.
Nowhere is it signposted that it is individual capacity
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 04:58 a.m.
It's perfectly standard to only detail ind cap if it is ind cap
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 04:59 a.m.
It is clearly signposted throughout that it is official capacity
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 05:00 a.m.
Thus, your ruling that we should amend is the only thing that would give rise to this statue of limitations issue
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 05:00 a.m.
it is their decision to never have brought this up until now
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:19 a.m.
no
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:20 a.m.
you dont have to say something is individual capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:20 a.m.
that is always assumed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:20 a.m.
this capacity issue should've been resolved at the beginning of litigation
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:20 a.m.
and it was
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:20 a.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:21 a.m.
and it is not our decision to not bring this up until now
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:21 a.m.
i never brought this issue up
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-01 11:21 a.m.
because its not an issue
NicklausNicklaus
that is always assumed
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 11:44 a.m.
how can it be assumed when it is clearly referenced
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 11:44 a.m.
throughout
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-01 11:44 a.m.
that defendant was in his ccso employeeship
shah
shah 2025-06-01 11:46 a.m.
if this was an official capacity case was this arbitrated @huddy.
shah
shah 2025-06-01 11:46 a.m.
for my own curiosity
shah
shah 2025-06-01 11:46 a.m.
if so please provide me a copy of the final arbitration order
adlithestevenson
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 01:47 a.m.
Please note:
As original defense counsel, I was contracted through the Sheriff's Office to represent the Defendant. This was private representation, as I was not affiliated with the government. To the best of my knowledge, under RichoCornwall, this suit proceeded in individual capacity given the course of events and my presence as counsel.

I apologise for the intrusion, but I hope to clarify this issue.

cc: @shah @huddy. @Nicklaus
(edited)
shahshah
if this was an official capacity case was this arbitrated @huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-02 04:22 p.m.
I will have to check with previous attorneys
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-02 04:22 p.m.
allow me to do so
adlithestevensonadlithestevenson
Please note: As original defense counsel, I was contracted through the Sheriff's Office to represent the Defendant. This was private representation, as I was not affiliated with th...(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-02 04:23 p.m.
So you decided on your own that this was an individual capacity suit and decided to represent the government whilst not being employed by the government?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-02 04:23 p.m.
either you are just going around committing violations or you were contracted by a government agency, CCSO, which therefore would in good faith show that you did represent the government
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:36 p.m.
ur the only one confused james
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:36 p.m.
it is individual capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:36 p.m.
it has always been individual capacity
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:36 p.m.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:37 p.m.
it cannot be against the govenrmenet
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 04:37 p.m.
you cant sue the government for wrongful death
huddy.huddy.
So you decided on your own that this was an individual capacity suit and decided to represent the government whilst not being employed by the government?
adlithestevenson
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:20 p.m.
Please utilize the course of proceedings test. Given the monetary damages and the torts invoked, plus the indication that arbitration would be unconstitutional given the private defense, it was only logical that I, as NHCSO counsel, would represent a NHCSO Deputy sued. Even if it is against the government, that precludes your cause under 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3104.1 given that that is an individual capacity tort, so I would choose your arguments very wisely, counselor.
huddy.huddy.
either you are just going around committing violations or you were contracted by a government agency, CCSO, which therefore would in good faith show that you did represent the gove...
adlithestevenson
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:23 p.m.
I would also advise your against fallacious and errant reasoning. First, you present a false dichotomy, which indicates that you have the logical capacity of the average FoxNews anchor. Second, if this suit was against the government, then SGO would take primary lead on representation. However, that does not preclude a private attorney, being contracted with a government agency, to handle litigation against, or surrounding, that agency's interests when the suit proceeds in individual capacity. This is common in local governments where a City Attorney would be unwise.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:29 p.m.
@shah can you rule on the motion for summary judgment\
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:29 p.m.
i been waiting ages
shah
shah 2025-06-02 07:30 p.m.
shahshah
Click to see attachment.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:34 p.m.
ok but sometime soon, queen
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:34 p.m.
cuz im tired of waiting
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:34 p.m.
very very tired
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-02 07:35 p.m.
adlithestevenson
adlithestevenson 2025-06-02 07:39 p.m.
Maybe if Richo didn't intentionally delay the case.....
adlithestevensonadlithestevenson
Maybe if Richo didn't intentionally delay the case.....
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-04 05:50 p.m.
@shah Hey Dr. Khaled
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:30 p.m.
@shah Can u write this instead of the LETI ruling
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:30 p.m.
Thanks
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:30 p.m.
or minute order deny so i can appeal
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:30 p.m.
Thanks
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:31 p.m.
im itching
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:31 p.m.
Stfu with your intelocutory apeal(edited)
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:31 p.m.
no pls rule fr
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:31 p.m.
its been 6 months
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:32 p.m.
The Court denies your Notice to Appeal
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:32 p.m.
I will mandamus u hoe
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:32 p.m.
rule!
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:33 p.m.
Bye this already went to mandamus and failed
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:33 p.m.
shahshah
Bye this already went to mandamus and failed
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:34 p.m.
that was ryan
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:34 p.m.
can u rule pls
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:35 p.m.
Ugh
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:35 p.m.
Wheres the motion in writing again
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:45 p.m.
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:45 p.m.
thank you
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-06 12:45 p.m.
@shah
shah
shah 2025-06-06 12:45 p.m.
ur so kind
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-07 07:30 p.m.
@shah hows it going dr. khaled? are you putting in the work and hours
shah
shah 2025-06-08 12:56 p.m.
did the defendant actually suffer injury in the game @Nicklaus
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:06 p.m.
NO
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:06 p.m.
I know you didn't ask me
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:06 p.m.
But he literally suffered absolutely no injury - the game didn't initiate the prompt which results in somebody having the ragdoll fall and injury to health
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:06 p.m.
He just jumped up a bit higher than normal
huddy.huddy.
But he literally suffered absolutely no injury - the game didn't initiate the prompt which results in somebody having the ragdoll fall and injury to health
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:06 p.m.
i have confirmed that fall damage still takes place
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
therefore that constitutes bodily harm deputy ridgevilleborn
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
do you agree @huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
Not at all
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
Fall damage does not take place
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
if you jump up and fall
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
and face no animation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
especially at the low height that he jumped
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:07 p.m.
that is something ive been told by an developer
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
Have you shown the developer the clip?
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
yes
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
The height and specifics on what caused the obstruction to displace him?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
Interesting
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
And what was the comment?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
Definitely injury?
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:08 p.m.
the reason characters fling is because of roblox physics when a player touches a car
typically yes from fall damage
usually 10 hp
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:09 p.m.
@huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:09 p.m.
Chat
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:09 p.m.
The guy didn't even land on the ground
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:09 p.m.
he jumped five studs and landed on the car
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
with absolutely no animation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
there cannot be fall damage
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
i will slow down
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
Furthermore, Plaintiff didn't even cause this(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
Please review the clip in detail
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
Defendant stood inside his car
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
so as he drove forward, Defendant was inside his bonnet
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:10 p.m.
he wasn't hit by anything, he just jumped up
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:11 p.m.
there is zero liability on Plaintiff for whatever hypothetical (impossible) damage faced by him
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:11 p.m.
the viudeo shows at 0:11 mr pootis steering his car and accelerating in pursuit, that in itself does not defeat your claim but i am inclined to think it caused bodily harm to the officer
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:11 p.m.
i dont think there is really a factual dispute here as Mr Pootis failed to yield to lawful authority and then hit an officer with his car quite clearly(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
How did he hit an officer with his car
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
did an officer stand in front of him
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
and Mr Pootis drove into him?
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
which is still bodily harm, regardless
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
Did an officer stand in front of Mr Pootis and Mr Pootis proceeded to drive into him?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:12 p.m.
That's not what I see
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
the officer expected him to yield, when he did not mr ridgevilleborn hit his windows, at which Mr pootis then steered towards his direction
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
I see an icy road, causing Plaintiff's vehicle to drift slightly to the right, and an officer proceeding to enjoin himself with an engine and being forced to jump upwards once moving forward
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
that is what i see as am impartial party to this case
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
Plaintiff was literally reversing
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
Clearly due to the icy conditions of the road
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
this has nothign to do with him
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:13 p.m.
why would he reverse when there is no place
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
To get closer to the officer to read his messages
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
due to roblox length limitations
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
his reasoning does not matter
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
it wasn't to hit the officer
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
the officer glitched into his engine
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
unfortunately summary judgment is GRANTED in favour of the defendant, ridgevilleborn. written order to come soon.

@Nicklaus @goodness gracious @singhski @huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
completely based on an unknown, unconfirmed 'developer'
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
wonderful
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:14 p.m.
clark courts at their finest
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-08 01:15 p.m.
u do know desyncing and stuff is still a use of force right
huddy.huddy.
completely based on an unknown, unconfirmed 'developer'
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:15 p.m.
its also the fact that the plaintiff steered towards mr. born's direction and then caused him bodily harm
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:15 p.m.
regardless of the roblox glitch
shahshah
its also the fact that the plaintiff steered towards mr. born's direction and then caused him bodily harm
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:16 p.m.
Oh right because there's a single piece of evidence showing that Plaintiff steered his vehicle?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:16 p.m.
There are only two pieces of evidence - Plaintiff reversing backwards, and icy road conditions
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:16 p.m.
Ask your imaginary developer about what icy road conditions due to a wheel axle
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:16 p.m.
you can see that because the wheel changes direction when you press W/A/S/D
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
see 0:10 of the video
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
Really? seems to me that the back wheel stays completely straight the entire time
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
yet this vehicle is a four wheel drive
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
it doesn’t even matter if the officer got hit James
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
:✌️::🥀:
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:17 p.m.
anyways im going to close this matter you are free to appeal whomstever desires
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:19 p.m.
We request a written ruling
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:19 p.m.
To understand the true extend of the basis on the magical developer's comments
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-08 01:20 p.m.
u waived ur appeal by only arguing there was a factual dispute
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:20 p.m.
Ah forgot I was talking to you
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:20 p.m.
thanks
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:20 p.m.
written order is coming soon but my minute entry shall suffice for a ppeal for now
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:22 p.m.
the court would advise your client to yield to lawful authority in future conducting an traffic stop to avoid altercations (? and then trying to purposefully desync someone)(edited)
shah
shah 2025-06-08 01:22 p.m.
god bless
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
Where the fuck did we get desyncing from
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
hold on
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
bros throwing around terms now
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
desyncing is not swerving at -4 mph sideways on an icy road into a stationary individual
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-06-08 01:24 p.m.
r u saying the plaintiff wasn’t operating his vehicle with due care given the road conditions
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 02:34 p.m.
Hmm let's see
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 02:34 p.m.
Do you possess the ability to read?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-06-08 02:34 p.m.
Clearly not
shahshah used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:40 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:40 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:41 p.m.
Exported 893 messages